A Long View of What Is Near: The Place-Based Work of _PSA:_

Every now and then, a piece of visual art strikes a writerly chord in me—speaks, in other words, to my practice or my concerns as a person interested in telling stories and sparking collective imagination. I experienced such a confluence of sensibility several months ago when three messages appeared in large letters affixed to a wire marquee on the Midtown exterior of the Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis. I watched the concrete facade and its messages change alongside the shift from spring to the sweltering heat of a St. Louis summer, as the days lengthened toward the solstice and a year spent making up for lost time quietly tipped past its halfway mark.

In March the wall read, In deep darkness we become invisible. Somehow, we find each other and feel our way through. Written by artist Jen Everett, the text probed what life means in “this time,” particularly our present moment, when all of us, as a fragmented collective, are learning at uneven rates to restore ourselves and our loved ones, or still (forever) wading through loss and mourning and the daily tasks of survival, and examined the gnarly epistemological issues dredged up from solitude (hers, ours).

In May the message changed, and the wall now read, We are made to see beyond this ocean around us - Stvoreni smo da vidimo dalje od okeana što naš okružuje. This aphorism’s author, artist Aïda Hasanović, uses the idea, expressed in both English and Bosnian, of seeing beyond an ocean of solitude and insularity as a metaphor for overcoming our current political and social environment. As a refugee of the Bosnian Genocide, Hasanović, like many others from her country, emigrated to St. Louis, which has the largest Bosnian population outside of Bosnia itself, and this aphorism offers the metaphor through which she negotiates her own crossing of physical borders and what she has now identified as a need to deconstruct the notions of difference put forth by the gatekeepers of language and belonging.

In June, the previous message was again replaced. I close my eyes and take a deep breath — I am filled with the wisdom of my ancestors: these words come from the artist and wellness practitioner Simiya Sudduth, who made the piece as both an affirmation and invitation, and as a welcome break from the disempowering structures of daily life. This is a reminder that, entrenched as we are in the sediments of oppression and neglect, the act of self-care and a connection to ancestral knowledge is not only essential to individuals’ physical, mental, and spiritual health but also to collective liberation.

The three text installations were part of the museum's group exhibition Stories of Resistance and organized by PSA:—a St. Louis-based artist duo consisting of the multimedia installation artist Marina Peng and the designer and illustrator Shannon Levin. Originating in 2019, PSA: has presented the majority of its projects on the side of a brick building at 2222 Chippewa Street, in the Marine Villa neighborhood, one of several in St. Louis to have been shaped by disinvestment and the departure of many of its residents. Peng and Levin's project is interdisciplinary in nature, and local writers with robust practices who have added their words to the 2222 Chippewa building include the poets Jacqui Germaine, Joss Barton, and El Williams III. The rotating text installations PSA:—which have also included a billboard in North St. Louis—use the familiar framework of a public service announcement to call attention to themselves in order to warn of threats to physical safety, to address the emotionally urgent questions of what it means to serve a public and to facilitate collective healing—in short, to create public announcements that engender, in place of fear and vigilance, feelings of safety and refuge. In initiating this project, Peng and Levin ask, “What is it that the people need to hear?” Moreover, they ask how to make art that is sustainable and gives a platform specifically to amplify underrepresented voices rather than the artist-organizers themselves.

Ideas about collective healing and restoration are not new to St. Louis. In the early 2000s, an urban renewal effort known as the Grand Center Project endeavored to create a “cultural renaissance” in Midtown by restoring historic buildings and filling the empty space left behind by white flight and dispossessive reconstruction dating back to the 1950s. But PSA: takes a community-centered approach by commissioning local artists to speak to the needs of underrepresented groups here and now. PSA: is oriented toward the local and the specific, not only in who they choose to engage, and in their aesthetic choice to occupy the traditional imagery of St. Louis’s visual vernacular (the faded ghost signs, the red brick, the hand-painted street murals), but also where in the city they situate their installations and, by extension, who they are identifying as their “public.” Geographically, CAM and Grand Center sit just south of what is known as the Delmar Divide, a single long-running thoroughfare that splits the city into two distinct wealth and racial sectors. PSA: directs its messages—written predominantly by artists of color—toward the Northside, such that they are visible to a historically Black neighborhood otherwise estranged from the Grand Center development, which does not extend above Delmar Boulevard.

It also occurs to me that vision is central to all three of the public service announcements quoted above. These aphorisms about vision range from metaphors of visionary seeing to metaphors of unseeing. Closing one’s eyes, as in Sudduth’s case, is a metaphor for a healing retreat into one’s intuition. In Everett’s case, becoming invisible or losing the sensation of sight actually opens up other senses, such as tactility, as a means of knowing one another. In Hasanović’s piece, there is even a play on the word “made” (made as in created, which is what the Bosnian word stvoreni translates to, but also in English made as in implored to, necessitated to), such that vision—specifically far-sighted vision—is interlaced with a religious or metaphysical imperative. The double-edged power of vision is evident at PSA:’s other locations as well. For example, the artist Jessie Donovan’s billboard on McCausland Avenue also takes up the theme of sight, pointing out the gaps in which vision fails to produce intersubjective understanding:

Here, There, and Nowhere: Cynthia Arrieu-King's _The Betweens_

The Betweens, by Cynthia Arrieu-King (Noemi Press, 2021)

It shouldn’t feel surprising that a work called The Betweens would exist in a space amid genres—between poetry and prose, personal history and memoir—yet Cynthia Arrieu-King’s new book endlessly surprises in its negotiation between the lived and the remembered, between the recounting of direct event and the sense that an event has left along the way. Arrieu-King’s book gives us more than either the recollection of experience or the derivation of experience compressed into verse. Jumping from fragments of encounters to conversations and impressions, this autobiographical work moves beyond the urge to tell us everything that happened in the author’s life, but rather how the things that happened shaped the person and the writer she has become. In her acknowledgments, Arrieu-King notes how some of The Betweens came into being within the manuscript of her first book of poems, People Are Tiny in Paintings of China, and this gives us insight into another way this work exists between spaces—in this case, the gaps within the writer’s processing of her own memories. Those two books now feel like shadow texts to each other, in which a line from the former as crisp as “I was down in the hole collecting rain” becomes another lens through which to read the larger narrative threads now brought together. What sets The Betweens apart is how personal it is about both the nebulous space in which Arrieu-King has always lived, rooted in her identity and upbringing, and a broadly shared BIPOC space through which her life runs.

The Betweens presents the experience of so many of us in this New World of ours that it’s difficult not to turn this review into a litany of one’s own experiences. My brother and I grew up in suburban Atlanta, the kids with the funny names with the funny religion and the parents who had accents. What the book captures so well is the dual sense of not belonging: our original awareness that one does not quite belong here in America, but also our growing recognition as we get older that one does not belong anywhere else either, certainly not in the Old World, where one remains the American Cousin—we had “American” stamped on our foreheads, even among family, my dad would say. All that can be said about this acute feeling is: This is why we do what we do, this is why we not only gravitate to the exploration of language and culture and memory, but also to one another, other misfits in this broad cultural experiment. Arrieu-King gives us in pinpoint accuracy not a poetics statement but an operating system, a way of understanding how we have come to be who we are. The book opens in a place familiar to me:

I noticed that Chinese people didn’t think of me as Chinese. I told my dad how they’d say I wasn’t “a real Chinese.” I felt stuck in a gray area between this reaction and the reaction—to my playing piano, to good grades, to being quiet—that I was very Asian. My mom and dad kept neutral faces as I told this story and said not to say anything about it, to be quiet.

We learn to shut up about ourselves, to find that space to blend in so no one notices us. It’s an impossible task, ultimately, because we are betrayed by our skin and by our names, shown for who we are to a world that doesn’t understand what we are. This can be especially painful at a time when we don’t even really understand what we are ourselves. When we don’t fit a stereotype, it’s impossible to get along. When we do—I don’t know. We’re always trapped. 

The lessons are direct: You don’t out yourself as other, as best as possible. You laugh along at a joke, you do as asked in the hopes of being just another person on a beach or in a school. Be one of the good ones and they won’t turn against you, the “perceived model minority,” she writes. But the journey in Arrieu-King’s work is not only her own, but also that of her family, which finds itself in between spaces too, within their individual struggles in an unfamiliar place, their collective struggles as a family and even their struggles with one another. Her brother becomes a sheriff, his own attempt at joining the existing power structure of the society we have adopted. Similarly, the silence of the parents in response to the racism their child faces, the urging to remain silent, is ingrained deeply, cultivated because silence is what allows  us to survive our otherness: “not to say anything about it, to be quiet, let it ride, not to let my upset show.” It is necessary, the parents believe. For me, this might be the most interesting thread through the work, in attempting to understand my own parents and their experiences, as well as that of my older brother as a child taken to a new country, all of them leaving a home in an attempt to find a new one, to create a new space for themselves, but inevitably finding the empty spaces between spaces. I remember a particular day in which I was arguing with the boy down the street about religion and my parents later told me to just not say anything at all. We learn, in some ways, to shut up about ourselves as a reminder that we are nowhere at all.

Arrieu-King’s writing about her father makes me wonder too “if this is what my father ever felt for escaping to the United States.” There was not only guilt in our home over having left others behind, wavering between an act of necessity and an act of abandonment. Back “home,” their parents were aging, their siblings who hoped to get their own children across the ocean were slowly growing disappointed or even angry over the years. Sometimes what Arrieu-King refers to as an escape felt like more to me like a curse, a failed obligation to others. Throughout The Betweens, this too seems to weigh heavily on her father, a sense that one should always act in certain ways, to be working and thinking toward the future and not wasting time. It is a heavy burden for a child, but one that Arrieu-King, while struggling with, also comes to understand better. It is not hard to see why one’s parents loom large in a personal work such as this, a lost parent even more heavily. The lessons of the parents resonate profoundly, their realizations speaking not only to us as readers, but also as children.

Time throughout The Betweens seems jumbled, moving abruptly from one period to another, but the progression of vignettes, memories, and observations also feels incredibly linear, the mind wandering naturally through a personal and collective history in such a way that each new moment seems the result of all the ones that came before it. Arrieu-King avoids the traps of revelation, displaying a control in her writing that does not force any sort of surprise or grand epiphany by the end. She evokes the way that life is rarely punctuated by large epiphanies, but rather tiny ones throughout, built on the understandings of the past: 

Nothing will teach you to wear a poker face faster than having a very dark sense of humor or being surrounded by co-workers who are kind, good, generous, and correct you, and explain to you each time you make a dark joke, how that isn’t fair … Always looking for what will keep you from ruin.

While each stanza (or paragraph) of the book gives us a brief glimpse of time, an isolated moment, there is also the recognition of how each of those moments is its own realization, its own microgesture in the grand experience. We are left with the insistent sense that Arrieu-King has not only given voice to the in-between spaces of her experience, but also filled those places of silence with her speech.

The Galleries

New York City, 2021

I've been trying to learn from Agnes Martin1. She made big, abstract paintings, but without the drippy athletics associated with her abstract-expressionist milieu. So, I've been trying to learn: the not-knowing of it, the strands of longing and pain forming waves of oceanic peace, with a single human person as a (slightly reluctant) point of contact between heaven and earth.

The drawings of Susan Te Kahurangi King2 are (I think) about the parts of the body that are touched, or that want to be touched. The human body caught-up in print and broadcast media, melding with a cartoon body, or the various cartoons that inform our own sense of it, of what it is to have a body at all. There's Bugs Bunny at his most lascivious, and Donald Duck at his most agitated, and distended goblins from someone's vision of Hell.

Judith Scott's3 bundle sculptures are eternal, because they beckon to all these aspects of remembered life that can't be recorded otherwise. It's a mix of sensation and love, weights once held close to the body. There is so much value now in knowing that something existed in space and was touched by a human being, in knowing that it contributed in some instrumental way—witness, vessel, conductor—to an act of love.

I guess I've been thinking about touch a lot, and I've been really drawn to textures and surfaces lately; maybe it's somewhat of a pandemic thing: getting back to basics, focusing on what you can feel, smell, and taste. Martin Wong's4 paintings of the 1980s Lower East Side seem to happen in a world where the borders—between New York City and any individual resident—have dissipated into meaninglessness: the city like a winter coat, wrapping tightly around one's shoulders.

While Jay DeFeo5 was painting 'The Rose' (1958–1966)—a sort of celestial relief sculpture in oil and crushed stone—her studio space got coated in a skin-like accretion of white paint, as if this San Francisco apartment was a part of the artwork. We know this because, when she was evicted from the space, she had to move the 2,300-pound painting elsewhere, and the move was documented by Defeo's friend Bruce Conner6 in his 1967 film 'The White Rose.' We see 'The Rose' sitting snugly in an apartment alcove, with soft sunlight at its edges, and in Conner's inky 16mm—this is the painting in its most beautiful possible state, it has to be. We also see 'The Rose' being arduously lifted onto a truck, and hauled away by a group of laborers. So is it a vessel of the Heavenly sublime, or an ungainly and burdensome weight, or both? It's both.

Now I'd like to explain some details of a Douglas Huebler7 piece, because I really like it, and I don't think it's very easy to find online. The piece is 'Black Plane #2 (Study)' (1979), and it's comprised of two sheets of paper in a frame. The paper on the right is all black (I think it's covered in ink); the paper on the left says (typewritten):

TO THE EXTENT THAT THESE WORDS, AND THE
BLACK PLANE REPRESENTED AT THE RIGHT ARE

MOTIONLESS,

          COLORLESS,

                    AND FULLY FRONTAL

TO THE PLANE OF THIS SURFACE, THEY ARE
PHENOMENALLY SIMILAR, BUT, IF CONSIDERED

ONTOLOGICALLY

THEY SHARE NO COMMON SENSE OF PURPOSE;
TRUE TO TYPE, THE WORDS ENGAGE IN A
COMBINED EFFORT TO FABRICATE MEANING
WHILE THE BLACK PLANE SIMPLY PRESENTS
ITSELF, SELF SUFFICIENT AND NATURAL,

SUBLIMELY INDIFFERENT

                    TO CULTURAL AMBITION

A lot of conceptual art of the '60s and '70s seemed to prod at limits—the limits of language, of representation, of knowledge—and one of the strange things about looking at it now, is realizing that we have not (and will never have, maybe?) expanded or transformed these limits in the past 50 years, not really. The particular forms of messaging are rigidly locked in time, though, and now part of the struggle for these works is to fight off a sense of quaintness, a generational fissure that settles like dust.

I was struck by the sense of rarity in Laura Aguilar's8 videos. Aguilar is remembered mainly as a photographer, but she made some remarkable video art in the mid-'90s: in blurry, desaturated footage, we see Aguilar herself speaking plaintively and generously about deep depression and suicide. I've seen a lot of videos in my life, but very few like this, and why is that? Aren't there bitter YouTube apologies, manic TikTok confessionals, desperate video/text messages, that sort of thing? There must be, but I don't see them, because they're not meant for me. Aguilar's videos feel raw and honest, and also they were made as art, which eventually means that I can see them and write about them. One of the irreducible elements of an artwork is the extent to which it was chosen to be shared with the outside world; it's a matter of intention and also of directionality. As Agnes Martin wrote, "There are two endless directions. In and out."

Lucy Raven's9 'Casters X-2 + X-3' (2021) is comprised of four bright spotlights attached to robotic apparatus; I saw it in a large, formerly industrial gallery space, where the rings of light moved slowly over patchy brick walls and worn wooden ceilings. And you know, when you think about it, electric light is a pretty new invention (by the time Thomas Edison patented incandescent bulbs, the world already had photography, telephones, stainless steel, and nitroglycerin). And I think that collectively we're still not over it; I'm definitely not. These widely available machines that allow us to speak in a language otherwise reserved for destructive gods: surely this must have been a sharp, schismatic break, right? The people who lived before electric light, and the people living in the years after. And now we have "light pollution," you see. We make so much light that it becomes, effectively, poisonous.

I was alone when I saw Charles Atlas's10 'Angel Dust' (2021) (well, except for the gallery attendant, who had to turn it on for me), and it was almost like I dreamt the whole thing. It's a specially designed video projection onto a sandstone pleasure pavilion façade from early 19th-century India (part of a series of shows in which different artists worked with this odd, lovely piece of architecture). The arcs and corners of the façade were lit up in salaciously tacky colors, greens and purples straight off of the internet, with white-light borders drawn around the structure's large, empty windows. It was like two friends drunkenly smiling at each other from across the bar: a shared purpose, not harmful but somewhat mischievous, pleasure-seeking, unashamedly superficial, unmistakably human.

Again, I'm not sure how much of this is the pandemic, but when I think about art I saw in 2021, I remember a lot of pretty lights. Tacita Dean's11 16mm footage of a golden, glowing moon rising silently over a dark landscape. An-My Lê's12 tender, delicate black-and-white photos of bombs raining down on a U.S. Marine training ground. Ching Ho Cheng's13 exquisitely flat gouache paintings of sunlight through windows.

I also remember some vivid colors. Derek Jarman's14 feature-film masterpiece 'Blue' (1993) projected onto a large gallery wall, so that the space is given to the film's one and only image: a full, ponderous shade of blue. The honey-butter-pancake yellows and oranges of a sun-drenched erotic-art studio, as imagined in recent paintings by Lisa Yuskavage.15 The sickly-sweet pinks and blues of Wong Ping's digital animations.16 The shimmering, opaque yellow of a Rachel Whiteread cast-resin sculpture.17

I remember the pinkish-reds of Carolyn Lazard's18 video installation 'Red' (2021); I actually didn't like this piece at first, but it's different when I think about it now. For 'Red,' Lazard rubbed her finger back-and-forth over a smartphone camera, creating a pink-red-pink strobe effect; in the adjoining room, a separate video shows warning text when the strobe is on, and gives countdowns to when the strobe will start or stop. It's a piece that moves in several directions at once, and in all cases it moves with tension and conflict: the standardized motions of a mechanical "effect" and the faltering movements of a human hand; the social good of warning labels and the impish urge to create something dangerous for the hell of it; the great powers of media and the sad limits of language. And in my memory, too, there are conflicts: a piece of art that I didn't like before, but which I like now; a deeply complex artwork, which I remember mainly as a simple room full of red light.

Etel Adnan's19 landscape paintings seem to have very little conflict. They're complex, but no part disagrees with any other part: there's a sense of holistic unity, maybe best seen in her small paintings of palpitating, colorful suns. The idea of everything-in-its-right-place has a lot of reactionary potential, but the order here is not due to an authoritarian impulse, but instead to some gentle process of nature and time. Things just belong where they do.

I had thought that Jesse Murry's20 landscape paintings were full of conflict, but now I think it's probably more accurate to say that they've been witness to conflict. It's as if a terrible storm had been frozen in earth, like a fossil. There's a harsh materiality throughout—you can see the oil and the grit, you can make out every brushstroke—but isn't that just nature at work? It's as if each painting contains its own tiny hurricane.

Deana Lawson's21 'Boombox' (2020) is a hologram—not a regular photograph—and it's so important that it is. The piece shows a 1990s (I think) stereo system, a bit beat-up but it probably still works. The components seem to be stuck together with packing tape, and there are four price tags pasted haphazardly onto the speakers. Each of these details feels important, because the whole thing—the whole object—feels important. It's a physical site where music, touch, money, community, age, and time all have a presence, and the hologram has its own weird presence, seeming to jut out into the space of the gallery. You sense that everything—everything important—passed through this object: love and tenderness, fear and rage, gossip and art, and now you're walking in its light, taking up its space. You're passing through it, too.




1

Agnes Martin: The Distillation of Color; Pace, May–June 2021

2

Parallel Phenomena: Works on Paper by Carroll Dunham, Susan Te Kahurangi King, Gladys Nilsson and Peter Saul; Andrew Edlin, May–July 2021

3

Super-Rough; presented by the Outsider Art Fair, June 2021

4

Martin Wong & Aaron Gilbert: 1981-2021; P.P.O.W., April–May 2021

5

Bruce Conner & Jay DeFeo: (“we are not what we seem”); Paula Cooper, September–October 2021

6

Bruce Conner & Jay DeFeo: (“we are not what we seem”); Paula Cooper, September–October 2021

7

Douglas Huebler, Sherrie Levine, Walid Raad: No More Than Three Other Times; Paula Cooper, April–June 2021

8

Laura Aguilar: Show and Tell; Leslie-Lohman Museum, February–June 2021

9

Lucy Raven; Dia, April–December 2021

10

The Pleasure Pavilion: A series of installations; Luhring Augustine, September 2020–July 2021

11

Tacita Dean: The Dante Project · One Hundred and Fifty Years of Painting · Pan Amicus · Significant Form · Monet Hates Me; Marian Goodman, September–October 2021

12

An-My Lê: đô-mi-nô; Marian Goodman, June–August 2021

13

Ching Ho Cheng (part of More Life); David Zwirner, September–October 2021

14

Derek Jarman (part of More Life); David Zwirner, June–August 2021

15

Lisa Yuskavage: New Paintings; David Zwirner, September–October 2021

16

Wong Ping: Your Silent Neighbor; New Museum, June–October, 2021

17

The Pleasure Pavilion: A series of installations; Luhring Augustine, September 2020–July 2021

18

Greater New York; PS1, October 2021–April 2022

19

Etel Adnan: Light’s New Measure; Guggenheim, October 2021–January 2022

20

Jesse Murry: Rising (part of More Life); David Zwirner, September–October 2021

21

Deana Lawson; Sikkema Jenkins & Co., May–June 2021