Seed Time: a report from documenta fifteen

Kassel, Germany, June–September, 2022

In a quiet room, a worn, knitted hammock sways in the light breeze, while sunbeams from the window gleam on the orange-red tiled floor. There's a yellow table, a wooden chair, and some leafy plants in the background, and not much else. The video, presented by the Nhà Sàn Collective as part of their documenta fifteen installation, moves slowly through a series of scenes like this: gentle, unassuming still-life tableau, seemingly shot in someone's nice, modest home, with very little movement (or none at all). It's a piece that would make a lot of sense installed in a wooden shed, by a garden: a place where, it feels, the world requires of you only to either work or rest, a place that invites the calm. At the same time, though, it's a piece that likely wouldn't work in a white-walled gallery/museum space: it might come off as aimless, or meandering, or detached. We're lucky, then, that in this case there was indeed a garden, and a shed, and an outdoor kitchen, and a collection of seeds from Vietnam, and a pair of large porcelain vases, and many other things, all of it sitting quietly in a semi-abandoned courtyard, waiting for visitors.

documenta happens every five years in Kassel, a small German city about two hours from Berlin. In an art world replete with recurring contemporary survey exhibits—your various biennials and such—documenta is probably the biggest perennial art show out there. And, it is big. It's hard to convey just how big documenta fifteen was—as a cultural event, sure, but even just as a physical thing. The show ran from June to September of 2022—about a thousand hours in total—and I genuinely wonder: what if someone had wanted to take all of it in? To read every book-length text, interact meaningfully with every participatory installation, watch every feature-length documentary video, read the transcripts of every panel discussion, listen to every podcast? Would a thousand hours even have been enough time? I honestly don't think it would have been. (At one point, I spoke with a visitor who was on her sixth day at the show, and she said that she still hadn't seen most of it.) It's not just that there was so much art to see, but also where the art actually was: more than thirty venues across the city of Kassel and into the neighboring town of Fulda, including a church, a public pool, a bus factory, a 16th-century fortress, a dilapidated nightlife complex, a subway underpass, a compost heap.

Kassel is sleepy in parts, but it's a pretty bustling place overall, with lots of nightclubs and a posh, downtown shopping district. You sense that this place is well used to accommodating affluent tourists, but still, the city goes all out for documenta. There are colorful documenta banners that you see first thing in the train station, the municipal buses are plastered in documenta signage, the restaurants downtown serve documenta-themed meals, and the local shops sell documenta umbrellas, documenta wallets and documenta handbags. There's even documenta-branded beer. Kassel has an abundance of museums—a Brothers Grimm museum, a museum of local agricultural history, a museum of death (the Museum of Sepulchral Culture, it's called)—and documenta seems to have claimed a significant chunk of space in all of them. At some point, it starts to feel a bit like an invasive plant (a benignly invasive plant): these curious little art projects that have sprouted up in various rooms across town, a welcome disturbance to the normal way of things, but still certainly a disturbance.

There was a particular seriousness to documenta fifteen. Not that there wasn't anything funny—there was actually a lot of humor throughout—but it was cut with a kind of severity, or solemnity. Thinking here of the installation by graphic novelist Nino Bulling, which involved loosely drawn, intimate comic-book panels printed on fabric, draped from the ceiling and lit with a fuzzy red light. There was a playful sweetness to this work, and also a strange or even ominous sense of intimacy, the images hanging like the scent of someone who's just left the room. Fehras Publishing Practices, a Berlin-based research collective, presented an installation on the culture of the Afro-Asian Solidarity Movement, and this piece also functioned as a sort of graphic novel. Individual panels of cheeky digital photos and brightly colored text, printed six feet high and fastened to large wooden stands, ordered together to form a sort of miniature labyrinth. It's an ambitious, compelling piece, but it was a bit clunky as an installation, and that kind of thing was an issue all throughout the show: when an exhibiting artist is a nebulously formed collective, or an activist project rooted in a particular location, their work might go through some punishing contortions before it can fit into a gallery space. One of the most charming pieces in the show is "Moondog": a giant, floppy dog puppet whose use has been shared between several different theater companies. It's a great puppet, but without a corps of performers to activate him, he just lays there, his jaw sagging onto the gallery floor.

documenta has always had a political cast to it (the first edition, in 1955, was meant to showcase art that had been banned by the Third Reich), but documenta fifteen wears its politics in a way that I haven't seen before at this kind of art show. This edition was curated by ruangrupa, an Indonesian collective, and the show centers collectivity and social practice, rather than the big-name gallery artists who've anchored previous editions. At times, it felt almost like some sort of educational program about modern-day collective practice, not an "art show." This isn't to diminish the work of any of the participants, which was often impressive and—so help me—inspiring, but it's hard to fully grasp these projects as a visitor (and tricky to try and evaluate them as a critic). Often, while walking through the various spaces of documenta, you'd come across a messy art studio with clay sculptures still in-progress on plastic-covered stools, or an outdoor meeting-room with a half-erased blackboard agenda, or a cache of crayon drawings by excited preschoolers, and all you could say, really, is that something happened here. At one point I came across a bunch of tattered, yellow chairs, arranged in a circle, and I honestly don't know if this was part of a project, or a project itself, or maybe just a bunch of yellow chairs.

So, you have collectives like Black Quantum Futurism, a small group based in Philadelphia, who created (among other things) a performance stage, printed advertisements, and a fanciful machine that asks visitors to submit their own thoughts on time and space (this was the piece installed in the subway underpass). There's FAFSWAG, an Aotearoa/New Zealand–based collective dedicated to queer, indigenous representation, whose work features its own members as colorful fictional characters, splashed onto trading cards, or music videos, or a delightful Mortal Kombat–like video game in which they dance-battle against one another. The Subversive Film collective curated a program of rare anti-imperialist documentaries from Tokyo. The film studio Wakaliga Uganda screened Football Kommando (2022), a collectively produced action movie. Tunisian group El Warcha created a rough-and-ready prototyping studio. The Fondation Festival sur le Niger presented wide-eyed, handmade marionettes used in activist street theater productions. The Port-au-Prince–based Atis Rezistans | Ghetto Biennale organized an exhibition within the exhibition: a bracing show of Haitian artists in a run-down German church.

Meanwhile, projects by individual artists often felt at-odds with this collective impulse but, predictably, they were some of the best works in the show. I really liked Graziela Kunsch's installation Public Daycare (2022), which not only worked well as a sculptural assemblage of mid-twentieth-century research on parenting practices, but which also functioned as a literal daycare over the course of the exhibit. Ultimately, the work is a lesson in how childhood is a space (one of many) in need of a liberatory politics. Safdar Ahmed's installation Border Farce-Sovereign Murders-Alien Citizen (2022) uses the language of DIY subcultures to tell his story of migration and detention in Australia: the harshness and morbidity of contemporary death metal echo through his own tale of violence and trauma. Pinar Öğrenci's film Aşît (2022) includes long, composed shots of her father's wintry mountain hometown in Turkey: placid, but with a cold, creeping dread.

documenta fifteen was a show of happenings, spaces, motions, feelings. I remember one moment, standing next to the graffiti-strewn indoor skatepark (a project of Thai collective Baan Noorg Collaborative Arts and Culture), looking at the big, operative printing press (provided by ruangrupa for use by other collectives), and then a guy climbed up there and started playing the drums. I don't know who the guy was, or why he did that, or why the printing press had a drum kit on top of it.

Thinking about it all now, the sensation that rings the most is one of grittiness, or dirtiness. Climate change and environmentalism had a heavy presence throughout, and in multifaceted work by Asia Art Archive, Britto Arts Trust, Cao Minghao & Chen Jianjun, and INLAND (among others), we always seem to come back to the earth, the soil, the ground. Amol K Patil's work (which was on view in a dark basement) included expansive, ground-level "stages" filled with subtly vibrating dirt. Nguyễn Trinh Thi's installation (a personal highlight) used programmed lights to cast the shadows of chili plants against the decaying walls of Kassel's Rondell, a 500-year-old defensive tower; as if by magic, the plants become instantly recognizable as human beings or, at least, some elemental trace of such, some part of something human. Jumana Emil Abboud's work (also a personal highlight) included gentle paintings, yellow wax talismans, and mournful verse penned in white ink: a sad conversation between Palestinian folk tradition, an individual person, and the land at her feet, culminating in a video in which Abboud reads poems about death over footage of a rushing, muddy stream. Hamja Asahn's tongue-in-cheek ideological chicken-shop signs (e.g. "Fanon Fried Chicken: Fast Food for the Wretched of the Earth") feel slicker than the rest of the show, with their industrially sanded edges, LED lights, and scholarly reference points, but these works, too, come back down to earth: through their evocation of a fast, greasy fried-chicken dinner. The UK-based Project Art Works collective facilitates painting workshops among neurodivergent and developmentally disabled members, and those paintings remind us that traditional art materials are also matters of grit and earth, masses of oil and mud: a tool for the people.

It seems terribly naive to call an art show "radical" when you can also buy an umbrella with the show's logo on it, but I do think there was something radical about documenta fifteen. I mean, there were moments of it, like a low pulse. At the very least, radical politics had a visible presence in this show, which is certainly not the case for most big art shows. It was those same visible politics that caused some controversy at this edition of documenta, largely due to the work of Taring Padi, an Indonesian collective that produces densely detailed agitprop paintings, many of them meant as literal protest signs. The group was accused of antisemitism because of some cartoonish characters in one of their large-scale murals, who were said to be based in antisemitic tropes (one of them had a long nose, some of them were anthropomorphized pigs), causing months of debate and leading some works to be removed from the show. A set of archival Palestinian short films called the Tokyo Reels also sparked controversy in September, initiating calls for their removal, but ultimately the work remained on view after pushback from ruangrupa.

The artistic avant-garde is, and always has been, friendly with leftist movements, but art museums often treat political radicalism as something taboo. After a while, you get the sense that an educated museum-goer expressing far-left sympathies would be like an office worker loudly worshiping a family of pagan gods. It's a disparity that I feel especially in the place I'm writing this, here in New York City, where community spaces keep getting bulldozed, and theaters keep going out of business, and a lot of the graffiti is actually ads for streetwear brands or cryptocurrency scams. I know it's a cliché—to write about how Europeans are just so much more cultured than Americans—but the fact is that I simply can't imagine anything like this happening in America right now (it probably helps that documenta is, largely, publicly funded, as opposed to major American exhibitions, which primarily rely on wealthy donors and trustees). American art institutions like to nod at progressive ideas but, come on, how much is that worth when you compare it to, say, New Delhi–based Party Office b2b Fadescha's documenta project, which included full-on underground queer BDSM sex parties? These parties took place in a dungeon-like stone-and-brick cellar, the churning drum and bass bouncing off the arched corridors. A project like that, in a show that also includes a daycare center, would likely be enough to get the whole thing shut down in the U.S., nevermind that those works are in different buildings, on opposite sides of town.

According to ruangrupa, documenta fifteen was meant as a grand-scale experiment in sharing, community, and solidarity. It's framed as a sort of large, collective project made up of smaller collective projects, with a sense that any individual pocket of the exhibit could be the site of a fully realized revolutionary vision. But then, revolutions don't mean much if they're confined to a single room, or museum, or art show; the question is, what comes after? Will the seeds of collective radicalism take root and germinate in the hearts of artgoers like me who took the train to Kassel for the weekend? Probably not anytime soon. I will be thinking about this show for a long time, though, as I'm sure many others will be, and that means something, right?

Party Office b2b Fadescha's project (which included those BDSM parties, as well as texts, videos, and other things) holds so much of what I found compelling about documenta overall. It's manifestly erotic work that's also deeply intellectualized, all without irony. There were funny images and phrases, but it never felt right to laugh. So, let's take it seriously: queerness and kink as a way to transcendence, the body as a site of liberation, a landscape across which beautiful revolutions are won. There's a real truth to this, and it's a truth that's so absent when picturing the fallow fields of the body in America's right-wing imaginary, a land of deceit where no instinct can be trusted. Even with doubts, I know what side I'd pick, which landscape I'd rather see on the horizon.

Fehras Publishing Practices' graphic novel was installed at Hafenstraße 76, an industrial building in Kassel far from the city center, and when I saw the piece, I was the only one in the room. On the outskirts of an unknown city, at the world's biggest art exhibit, in a large, concrete room, with the afternoon sun pouring in from the wide, industrial windows, I skimmed through a maze of six-foot-tall comic-book panels on the subject of radical cultural practice. All of these things happening at once, sensations joining together, and I was the only one to feel it, the only one who would ever stand in that particular light. It was brief, but I won't forget.

Thoughts Through a Blue Crystal

In days, omens and signs were sought – moments in the brain swelled with meaning –
– the shape of the clouds dreamed by chance at night could have seemed like a perusal at noon

and in the evening when the rain murmured on the rooftop –
– already the surprise could be felt somewhere –
(sleep could come along with its childish prayer found disarrayed in the morning)
– or used to head after two strangers
to listen to familiar – (remember?) – conversations –
(in the rain, in the grey weather and wintry evening flowers bloomed lilac with memory)
– in the bends of little streets with no names, would diminish – out of a vague feeling – breath.
– or there used to stand then on the road: –
someone who had a mouth with your smile! – –
- - - - - - - - - - -
They used to take hold of thoughts with their hands,
revitalize eyes with the chill of windowpanes
and convince the self – coldly, that you could be surrounded by walls
it has been forgotten: thoughts, like children, are too, too drunk
– and that they tread mute, circling the wall
– and that they look at you through the wall – –
- - - - - - - - - - -
Until they fell asleep because November came,
because the wind was staggering by the streetlamp: –
days changed on the roads like signs, made it tiresome to wander senselessly
– and peace will already be believed (sun overwhelmed with grey)
– so it was believed: there will already be peace –
– so it was believed: it will exist for a long time – –
- - - - - - - - - - -
When you swear truthfully, as if cutting the lie in half, like a knot, an entanglement,
you can learn from an undivinating conversation:
– on the day that passed without signs you came back!
(someone overturned on the desk by accident
the steel ink in a round blot: –
I will carve from two railroad tracks a serpentine ornament again in the distance.)
- - - - - - - - - - -
Tomorrow will have faded, like yesterday – the clouds pallid, like a canvas.
I will take a blue and shallow crystal in hand so that all’s less gray, sad –
I’ll peer at clouds through the window azure where gilded sculptures glitter;
the clouds do become a blue sky
in which the stars gild vastly.
– – as do Your eyes – –
(Probably You don’t know about it at all, have you even thought of it in a blink?
that you have eyes blue each day is grand to me, a miraculous event –)

6 November 1932

                          Translated from the Polish by Alex Braslavsky

The Elegy Machine

thoughts on vibration because why not

ask for taint close-up

ask Isabelle Huppert if she wants to converse with me

at a Viennese restaurant

we sat on the porch

under her supervision or with her knowledge

or was my family suddenly polite

the color loosens when water is applied

when she proposed “stir-crazy” as a new concept

near the birding retreat in emulation

a poetry magazine by the toilet for newcomers

habitués of the garlic festival

climbing the rock hill with presidential delusions

pretending I’m crawling under his desk

looking upward at the clock rather than at my crotch

pick-up-sticks on the fireplace bricks and hot egg nog

a tour of ABBA’s dressingroom

and I keep bringing up starlings

or the eel breakfast with beans

why sex seems like a shortcut to the symphony

typing a play about the angel in the backyard

he said aural massage

he is the plateau and I am the magazine

shower and peer through the hole

the bus trip could be a liberation-fest

like El Capitan in Yosemite but Lust Capitan

hoodwinked by natural sublimity on 8mm reel

Venice too with its cupcake holes

sedentary angel with collapsed ribs

grabbing my arm in the taxi to scold me for not being aesthetically radical

I was somewhat radical but I chickened out

and then he died but not as a result of my cowardice

town of the cats where masturbation on a bumpy floor

dropped licorice-like into the past’s mouth

shoplifted a radical book

expecting mystical hints

but what are sour balls

can you seize the homoerotic cavern

climbing over the sprocket holes

can you be cavalier about the arrival of the sleeping masses

nickel-and-diming the hot-tub salesman

I’m a fashion publicist

I teach drama to kindergartners

basic theater exercises

did your girlfriend ask you to shave your dick or was it your idea

did I offend you by including your name

or omitting it

and then more sex he said after undetectable

hang around the cavern until it starts popping out tidbits

like a gumball machine with big suckers

he also has a penchant for asymptotes

dipping his overalls in the toilet by accident

toss everything into the elegy machine and tumble dry

_from_ From a Winter Notebook

With winter settling on the place, the sedge
is dry, the woods stand bare. No enemy
to you, I watch the shadow of one hill
rise on the opposite, the valley sheds
its golden skin, grows dull before it drops
in darkness. Sounds sharpen—shards of dry leaves,
wings’ flap, the shake of an abandoned branch.
Outcroppings lose their yellow to the gray,
the swallows drilling holes in the blue air.
More smaller life beats in each metric cube
than in all of my body there is life.
The wind is noise, the wind is movement. Live
branches mingle with the dead. I’m barely
bigger than the ants, slower than spiders.
I don’t move the way these insects scurry.
The beetle has no map of the terrain.
They can’t see all of me at once. Each knows
nothing of what the other thinks. Maybe
they know what water cut these rocks to shape
of heavy brow above blind eyes. I’m not
a stone, nor a bug—that knowledge only
separates me from cicadas sleeping
under my feet. Flies will far outlive me.
The laundry stiffens. Stars, like sheets of white,
sing fearlessly of their own howling.
This perverse season has no fantasy.
Your absence deeper than the gorge, empty
geological truths that come between things.

Everyone That Got Off

at Back Bay I personally spoke to them individually, said the conductor, officiating down the aisle. Scorn came naturally to the narrator. What, pray tell, he said, were your exact words? Not loud enough for the conductor to hear. An imperceptible gust, an ectoplasm of dust and hair and punched-out tickets for the commuter rail—a great deal of my work deals with fictional writers writing about writing fiction. He mouthed the words. Imagine diagramming such a lip-sync, a multiple personality. He described himself as unrecognized, not not-great. Like climate change. He was no chaste champion of icebergs. He simply could not afford fossil fuel. Nor could the mammal both small and tall to whom he’d remained unmarried for seventeen years. Her psyche was mohair. Her fear was that he’d out himself writing on a topic insufficiently eponymous. They were childless. She said her female doctor was a prick. Pretentious to say that pocket notebooks were his finest work, but baby college students in satin baseballs caps, hockey fans four feet wide, their Satan-worshipping children in knee-length world-tour t-shirts—

The train rocked side to side. The lights went out and the starship made a starry sound. Out the dark windows, dank walls. He went online at night and built a Toyota. He opened a new tab and Frankensteined a Volvo. The lights came on again like dashboards, spacecraft, a bad trip at a bucolic Phish show, a girl of fifteen had thrown her skirt over his head and galloped off in her underwear. It might never happen again but he wished the train would take him farther than expected, he wished he would emerge changed.

Winter Room

An apple on a paper towel
on a dispenser of disinfecting wipes
on the carpet before us is just so
our eyes merge on one pastoral line

Z looked seriously and Z
looked at her serious looking
just so the leyline stretched
a scrim

A cold cone of mites
swirls before a shadow play
of night walks
across unruined city blocks
with people we miss

Folds of scratchy bed covers
shelter villages carved into hillside

I pack in my bag for tomorrow
a trinket box inlaid
with pearl flake

A dull husk emptied
of mung beans
once arranged
into a little henge
in the shag under
grandmother’s bed

Ancient homely stone
gathered into a box
stolen bead by bead
by mice or a ghost hand

R came in late
the morning I dreamt
of a twilit house
where I stood
knee deep in runoff

A radioactive stream
others just left there
vibing and ultrapink

Why Are Parsnips Confusing

the house has an itch

she told me about the disgusting ichor

Cioran or Coriolanus or Janus or tidal wave

is it rude to ask him if he's ever had a homosexual experience

nothing wrong with homosexual experiences

so why would it be rude to ask

it's like asking if he believes in God

why are parsnips confusing

stung by the end table’s nearness

the homosexual end table

like a highway with new tar

making the language fancy

when he grabbed me on the escalator

one of the longest careers in the history of cinema

Details

I woke wadded in night, my nose bleeding piteously but without purpose. The sheets were strewn with stains as if I’d brought down fall and I listened for my overgrown children downstairs, passed out across sofas. Streetlights glazed the windows. I brushed the sensor on my computer, it must have had a name as part of an anatomy, but my intimacy with it was pre-verbal. A screen dawned. I wanted to receive, respond, reactivate. There were no emails I hadn’t already seen. I didn’t want to initiate or generate. I wanted to say we had less, while my husband implied we had more—we were both trying to reduce our target. A car passed, calming while it lasted. My husband’s father was living as a hermit, growing his thorny curls to his knees at the end of the world in Nova Scotia. He claimed he was off the grid, that he ate “but roots”—we made finger ears—“and rabbits.” His beard smelled like canned peas, said my husband. I wanted to say the pain was greater than it was, while my husband said nothing, or he said the pain was nothing. It was a difference in how we protected ourselves. I wanted people to feel sorry for me, but I wouldn’t give the details.

Heavenly Hibiscus [01:04:00]

Man passes across a cloudy sky back in Malunguey, an open field, drone with a creaking undertone, /seeYAK/, /isang/ /kaunan/ /nyang/ /anghel/ in the eye of the sun, man in a hoodie with an earring, a woman in white profiled against the clouds. mutters soundlessly, a man’s voice, /i/ /Gumamela/ /Celis/, transcribed in the subtitles as Flower of Heaven, /Gumamela/ translated by Google as hibiscus or mallow, so /Gumamela/ /Celis/ is Heavenly Hibiscus, or Blessed Mallow, /Gumamela/ from my grandmother’s lips is red, floppy, showy, ruffly, a revolt in heaven, slow walk across a field shot as a tropical Corot

“A woman I love”

A woman I love
somewhere is dying
I sat in a park
My grandmother
came to mind
I was not taking the medicine
I was supposed to
I      shivered
My own words
             shaking me
The thoughts that drove them
How real     they may
       or not
       have been
Flowers everywhere

Fire [00:56:42]

Iron hammering a muted undercurrent faster than any action and on loop, lit by fire; a woman’s voice, /dyuus/, /lato/; both a steam engine far away and a stiff brushing against metal nearby against the usual long-held chord

Came Then

(Today childhood came to me unraveling)
There used to be drawers full of grandma’s keys –
rusty and shiny –
thick, thin –
you could whistle all kinds of songs on them.
Some had the din of heavy bumblebees
some the rumble of a mermaid’s throat,
but most were ones that whissstled high
finnnely – slighttttly
in sillllence,
like mice.
Quick, steely, sonorous, they beat against one another,
the keys to nonexistent, lost, non-doors;
sometimes red from rust,
sometimes mildew green.
(Today childhood came to me in the impossibility of dreaming in sleep)

And then I found the door for the lost key,
because every hour of life had a heavy latch,
and every day had its unlocked intricacy –
lost somewhere a bunch
of mystical keys
upon which I whistled naive ditties –
tiny, maudlin songs – –

(Today childhood came to me unraveling,
(Today childhood came to me in the impossibility of dreaming in sleep)

2 March 1933

                          Translated from the Polish by Alex Braslavsky

Dimpled Dialectic

yearning to film a dandelion

the psychiatrist invited me to an orgy in his new sober house

long kiss in front of the disapproving wounded subject

fear he will compile an obscene book from our chats

and then she died

eleven years ago when she still had a reputation

watercoloring the piazza

after your ballet fiasco

nylon stockings de trop on tanned legs

urinating on your laziness as if to neutralize a jellyfish bite

hosanna to the undertaker

the remembered aperture

pocking my consciousness

dimpled like an envelope vase or a pinch pot

promise me you won’t stay in the smelly hotel

what kind of incest pudding do I expect in my bowl

the wanderer has sun on his hind legs it says in the daybook

What Your Problem Is: Sommer Browning’s _Good Actors_

Good Actors, by Sommer Browning (Birds LLC, 2022)

“Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, my dear,” a scam artist told me recently. “It’s never about the money. Okay?” 

Impersonating a popular astrologer named Alice Sparkly Kat through direct messages on Instagram, the scam artist asked to “consider me” for an $80 reading. The tricky tone of this persona held me suspended between belief and disbelief for a full hour, an embarrassingly long time. The situation brought forth in me all of the attraction and skepticism, the thrall and resistance to thrall, so many of us feel when confronted by language that claims to teach us something about ourselves. I couldn’t help but think of the voice of this imposter, as well as the complicated response it elicited, as I encountered the speaker of Sommer Browning’s newest poetry collection, Good Actors, who also drew me in with potentially false promises of self-discovery and spiritual awakening.

One of the book’s recurrent elements involves the responses Browning collected to the pseudo-therapeutic question, “If you tell me which Twilight Zone episode you remember best, I can tell you what your problem is.” The poet asked this question to hundreds of people, writing “therapy-fueled aphorisms that ‘diagnosed’ their ‘problem’ inspired by their remembered episode,” as a footnote clarifies. Punctuating the length of Good Actors, these aphorisms are followed by brief meta-commentaries that—as becomes clear over the course of the book—are actual comments from the participants in response to their aphorisms. In this clever setup, the deeper we go into the psychology of the individual, the closer we come to finding that this is, in fact, a textual experiment in collectivity. Personality is a social document.

“An aphorist who hates aphorisms. A self-helper who hates the self,” goes a line in Browning’s poem “Life: A Draft (Prologue).” Yet despite this disavowal, Browning’s self-help aphorisms show a sharp aptitude for psychological analysis through the framework of television, which in turn frames the media itself as a kind of collective unconscious, capable of revealing nuanced sources of human suffering.

This makes sense from a poet, since readers have come to expect a degree of self-help from poetry. We want our poems to tell us something about ourselves, something that will make us better people, more enlightened, more evolved. But this raises the question: Why do we love so much to be told about ourselves? Why do we love to be told our flaws, our weaknesses, our failings—everything we deserve to be ashamed of? At what point does self-awareness undermine the very self we are trying to actualize?

The wording of Browning’s experiment assumes that every person’s fundamental problem is self-created and thus capable of being controlled, if only we become aware enough of what the problem is and what it means—an enlightened state that would make us bodhisattvas of the self. Browning addresses this issue cheekily, listing a host of her own favorite episodes when prompted by a participant, followed up by pages and pages of aphorisms written for herself.

 

*


After an hour of testing the astrologer’s impersonator to see if they were “real,” and then, once I was sure that they were “fake,” continuing to test them to see how much of an astrologer they could become when pressed, I blocked them, feeling my own powers of revelation waning. The astrologer’s impersonator did accidentally reveal that their real name is Jason.

According to Browning, it’s her mother’s theory that we are born actors into the movie of our choice. The ideal form of our character is our name; through our choices, we act out the rewards and consequences of a one-word script said to contain a self.

How did Jason feel, using social media to adopt someone’s else name (and identity) in order to convince me to send $80 over CashApp, while telling me it’s never about the money? It must have been sort of liberating, and very funny, acting like a guru and witnessing my fluctuations of faith in real time as we DM’d, as I nearly gave in to the role of follower.

In Browning’s title poem, “Good Actors,” the speaker wants to make a movie “about two actors exchanging money.” She gives them an evolving series of stage directions as they make their exchange: “EarnestlyReluctantlyHopefully.” When she finally directs them to fulfill this action “Lovingly,” the actors, having dropped the money at the speaker’s feet, move closer and turn off the camera. It was never about the money.

And yet, as one of the book’s epigraphs reads, “... it’s only in the movies that it’s easy” (John Cassavetes).

 

*


The Twilight Zone therapy aphorisms work as an extended joke throughout Good Actors because of their tight adherence to the form and their performative reach into the psyche curtailed by the absurdity of the premise. It’s a joke that recalls Dodie Bellamy’s highly original 2014 book The TV Sutras (Ugly Duckling Presse), another experiment in wacky yet banal self-help and spirituality through the mediated recourse of TV—it is, as Bellamy writes in her introductory note, “an inspired text born from a crisis of urban bombardment.” In The TV Sutras, the speaker’s routine includes doing yoga while watching Peaceful Weight Loss Through Yoga, meditating as if to get “into character,” then turning on the TV and channeling messages corresponding to whatever scenes arise. As with Good Actors, the media becomes fodder for psychological revelations that are both real and counterfeit.

But there seems to be something odd about “reading” actors the way we would read non-actors, since actors are conscious of being watched and scripts follow a preconstructed arc. Does life really imitate art? Bellamy’s Sutras read like subliminal messages from a marketing agency as much as the religious teachings of a guru. Browning’s experiment is more social; it is a Rorschach test, she herself notes, part Buzzfeed quiz, part psychonautic deep dive.

Perhaps what Browning resists more than “aphorisms” or “the self” is moralism. She writes freely of sex parties and other casual encounters, while Bellamy similarly blends spiritualism with a kind of comical pornography, as if to call out the fervor with which we attach ourselves to our spiritual leaders, cling to the words of our therapists, and relish our own moments in the spotlight, giving our friends advice and the like.

In Good Actors, there are instances in which the speaker seems to do things “for the story,” or because she identifies as “a poet.” This is a role Browning inhabits, a character she embodies, along with mother, gallerist, daughter, and friend. Maybe this kind of self-awareness in our roles is something we don’t talk about enough. When I do things with the goal of writing about them, which I do all the time whether it’s conscious or not, I tend to feel like an imposter. When Browning reveals herself as an actor of sorts, I understand this urge or even necessity to play the part, and recognizing myself in this phenomenon, I cringe, until I laugh.

“What is the connection between humor and excess?” Browning asks, following up with, “I don’t know.” The Twilight Zone aphorisms are funny to me because the speaker assumes excessive powers, giving her voice grandeur and conviction. The aphorisms are funny, too, because the speaker has mastered a voice she doesn’t necessarily identify with. They offer a kind of situational comedy next to the quippy lists that intercede them; without this juxtaposition it would be difficult to recognize the voice-throw, the deft change of register, when we return to our collective therapy session.

In one of the poems that take on an essayistic cast, schoolchildren ask Browning if she believes in the angels and muses some poets say speak through them. Browning says she believes in other people’s angels. Then she surprises, and terrifies, herself by saying:

 

I’ve been preparing for these angels my whole life.


The gravity of the statement, the irony of its potentially false characterization (an irony achieved through the intimacy of the text, no doubt, since I do get the sense that I know Sommer) creates a tension I find hilarious. The poet subsequently calls her to-do list “Prep for Angels” and begins to list the absurd choices and mistakes she’s made in preparation.

What’s an angel, I wonder, if not a voice that you trust to tell you what to do, a power that finds a way to justify itself to you? Angels are seductive, and they are everywhere, in this view.

 

*


I didn’t send the money to Jason. Instead, I paid to attend the “real” astrologer’s workshop, the one Jason was impersonating, the following afternoon. I went with the intention of writing about my experience there, for this essay. It happened to be a workshop on shame, and once in the Zoom meeting, I felt the expected shame wash over me. Much like Jason, I was an imposter, unsure of my own thoughts and feelings about astrology, attending less as myself than as a writer, a person of many masks, a scam artist for whom it—truly—is never about the money.

Halfway through the workshop, which entailed somatic exercises and journaling, I felt a deepening of attention, a shift. I discovered that in the construct of shame as it manifests in my body, one voice is always a god and another is always a believer.

Shame, I learned from the astrologer, can be transmuted, incorporated, for the sake of connection. With awareness of any conflict or contradiction between our various “voices” or “roles” comes the power to take creative liberties with scripts we’ve outgrown. It leads me to the question, what makes a “good actor”? If you recall, Browning’s title poem ends with the “good actors” turning off the camera. Lovingly.

Browning writes in “Single Mom,” “I want to make the mistakes / Famous people make … // I want to make these mistakes so well.” As Browning suggests, being beholden to another, even and perhaps especially through one’s mistakes, is also an aspect of love. 

 

*


Throughout Good Actors, Browning writes compellingly about intimacy through various angles—motherhood, sexuality, friendship—fulfilling her goal as a writer to communicate and connect, which is not the “given” it might sound like when it comes to poetry. One of my favorite poem-essays in the book revolves around the documentary Grey Gardens, about a mother and daughter who share the same name. What is the boundary between them, Browning asks? Lifting off from an exchange Big Edie and Little Edie have in the film, Browning ends the poem like this:

 

You’re free when you’re supported.

You’re free when you’re supported.

We measure love until everyone has it.


Elsewhere in the book, an observation about public land leads to these musings on collectivity:

 

And things that are ours
     Abide rules we learn through others.

      Yours and mine rules
      Are boring. We’re born with them.


Browning’s love is radical, exciting, with an eye to public good, encompassing even the self her speaker claims to hate. Preoccupied with the inner workings of “the joke” and “the surprise” within the confines of our current media reality, in which all of us are characterized as “followers,” Browning seeks out openings for shared relief, leaving no friend behind. 

_from_ From a Winter Notebook

Dark on snow—hawks plate the wind
over a field in winter, empty now that
it’s written, a rhythm has begun in writing.
Sky troubling the toes, singing its songs,
to work with language and not mean. Elegy
are you a monologue, leggy, or conversant
in shadows? Suspect the word enough is not
enough. Come back to me, first encounter.
The curls are slacker or the time runs faster,
flashing coming away from the shingled
roof. There’s the tree, a woody quality
to forest words. The trace of a bird’s beak
on snow, embarrassing the bark. I’m stuck
on a dime, a moment in the stocking on
your leg, snaggled trellis, of peripheral glance.
I look around. I look around and around.
The mouse mounts a retreat. The ashtray
begs to differ from every other. I drop a little
mess of distracted matter. A comma forming
on the cat’s forehead; a comma hangs over us.
We are dying to know ourselves. When’ll the fake
fox enter the real life of underwater foxes.
A sock on the wrong foot. Tomorrow I
can pick up a piece of the pieces, the policeman
on the corner of my cloak of indivisibility.
The fly-shit on the windowpane might gleam
in the rays of divine winter hydrogen.
Communicating tragedy in parking tickets,
the policeman looks around—everything’s winter.

Range

Downstairs, my teenagers ranged from child to adult. They still endowed me with the superpower to peel any orange. Superfamilies of language—mangled comment, concept album, single fire stick, standing reserve. I was on hold. “Your call will be … in the order it was … or for real estate taxes, your plat and lot number.” It helped to imagine warrened City Hall, charismatic land line, lost era of ash trays. In the end, I had to cross the city to City Hall to pay by hand, my fine motor skills habituated as a sleeping pill, my unhoused neighbor sleeping in the dog scratch against the arrested development mulberry tree. I’ve always felt most real when I’m farthest from home.